I spent the day writing questions for iLit. As an English teacher I tried to use only questions that I had written. Initially it was because I didn't like anything that I came across, and then as time went on it just became a habit. People often ask how you write questions and I don't think I've ever given a satisfactory answer to the question.
Anyhow, I'm taking a break from the iLit question writing to have a metacognitive moment and write about writing.
New English teachers might be interested in this post if they're wondering how to approach the task. English teachers who already write their own questions might be curious to compare approaches. Here's the approach I use:
So there's my writing process. I'd better get back to the grind, now. If you're done reading this post and wishing you had more to read check out this VDay article on how to date a writer.
Anyhow, I'm taking a break from the iLit question writing to have a metacognitive moment and write about writing.
New English teachers might be interested in this post if they're wondering how to approach the task. English teachers who already write their own questions might be curious to compare approaches. Here's the approach I use:
1) I read once to get an overall picture of the piece if it's short. I like to immerse myself in it and block out all of my pre-conceptions the first time through. I just want to know what's going on and who's all there and what does this author person want me to see.
2) The I re-read the material slowly, making notes at critical places where I think I can insert an interesting question or places where something revealing but not obvious is happening. I often make questions to draw students attention to these sections as I am reading.
3) I label literary devices (metaphors, similes, analogies, ect.) that have to do with meaning as I go along. These make good questions because you can ask students to unpack and make meaning of them.
4) As I go along I look for opportunities for students to connect and extend. This is one of the hardest things to get a hang of because basically you have to look for the author's intent, try to figure out how the student sees it for the first time, and then ask something leading to get them to sort of come together and go beyond at the same time. Once you get the hang of it this is intuitive.
5) At the end I develop a research question connected to the text. Usually the research grounds the text in the socio-political reality that the text originated from (very Emma LaRoque).
6) I try to develop a question that gets at the big idea or theme of the piece.
7) Sometimes you have to connect the piece to a specific set of standards or have a certain quote of types of questions. This is challenging because at this point it's all been very intuitive and/or inductive where you just go through the text and look for questions to naturally arise. If I have criteria/expectations I review them, then see if any questions I've already developed can be modified to meet the criteria.
8) Up until this point I've somewhat put my own thoughts to the side. At this point I think about the group I'm working with (when applicable), my own ongoing themes in teaching (health and wellness, community connection, indigenous revitalization, personal development, responsibility) and see if there are ways that I can slide some of my own themes into the questions. Usually I select literature based on the extent to which they touch on these items so it's not a struggle to write questions around this.
9) Then I put stuff into chronological order, and review it. There should be a nice mix with a variety of question types. I throw out a lot of questions because once you have a set developed it has to have some coherency otherwise it's just a mess. Then I hit send or post or copy and go back to whatever I was doing before I wrote the questions :)
So there's my writing process. I'd better get back to the grind, now. If you're done reading this post and wishing you had more to read check out this VDay article on how to date a writer.


